MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004952958 · doi:10.4324/9781315691152-12

Inclusion: defining definitions

2016· book-chapter· en· W3004952958 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tracey Edwards, Graham Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueINCLUSIVE EDUCATION · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theology and Sovereignty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)Computer scienceSociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chapter focuses on policies which are implemented in Greece for diverse students, especially for two main groups: children coming from different national backgrounds and children with special needs. It addresses the challenges that are caused by financial crisis and presents the introduction of policies; Greek society and education system are still a long way off being characterised as inclusive and diverse. In the twentieth century, Greece experienced waves of migration, mainly to countries such as the United States, Great Britain, Germany, Sweden, Canada and Australia. The rapid changes in socio-demographics of Greece created a dichotomy in Greek society: the population who were nationals and the &s;others&s;, who were immigrants or repatriates. According to Hellenic Statistical Authority&s;s official data, 206,000 migrant children in Greece attend pre-primary, primary and secondary education. The recent economic crisis in Greece has influenced relations between the native population and large number of national and cultural migrants and religious and ethnic minorities residing in the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0070.013
Scholarly communication0.0160.026
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINCLUSIVE EDUCATIONSame topicPolitical Theology and SovereigntyFrench-language works237,207