MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004956562 · doi:10.1142/s0129167x20500251

A counter-example by Yagita

2020· article· en· W3004956562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsVariety (cybernetics)CohomologyPure mathematicsGroup (periodic table)ConjectureSpinorAlgebraic varietyFlag (linear algebra)Algebraic numberAlgebra over a field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to a 2018 preprint by Nobuaki Yagita, the conjecture on a relationship between [Formula: see text]- and Chow theories for a generically twisted flag variety of a split semisimple algebraic group [Formula: see text], due to the author, fails for [Formula: see text] the spinor group [Formula: see text]. Yagita’s tools include a Brown–Peterson version of algebraic cobordism, ordinary and connective Morava [Formula: see text]-theories, as well as Grothendieck motives related to various cohomology theories over fields of characteristic [Formula: see text]. We provide a proof using only the [Formula: see text]- and Chow theories themselves and extend the (slightly modified) example to arbitrary characteristic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it