Négocier les conceptions de l’art : les Inuit et l’Occident
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On a souvent reproché aux artistes inuit de vouloir satisfaire le goût des amateurs occidentaux et de se plier à des conceptions artistiques qui leur étaient étrangères. De telles critiques témoignent d’une perception essentialiste de la culture ainsi que de la prégnance d’un système binaire d’oppositions refoulant jusqu’à la possibilité d’une voie tierce, médiane ou conjointe. La négociation des contrastes accompagne pourtant bien des rencontres interculturelles, de même qu’elle collabore au processus d’appropriation et conduit à réaliser des choix signifiants. Cet article se propose d’examiner la manière dont les praticiens et les acteurs culturels inuit parviennent à composer avec les règles du marché occidental de l’art et à investir des notions allochtones tout en préservant certaines valeurs traditionnelles jugées essentielles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".