Hybrid Antigens Expressing Surface Loops of ZnuD From Acinetobacter baumannii Is Capable of Inducing Protection Against Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acinetobacter baumannii is an important human pathogen causing substantial mortality in hospitalized patients for which treatment with antibiotics has become problematic due to growing antibiotic resistance. In an attempt to develop alternative strategies for dealing with these serious infections surface antigens are being considered as targets for vaccines or immunotherapy. The surface receptor proteins required for zinc acquisition in Gram-negative bacterial pathogens have been proposed as vaccine targets due to their crucial role for growth in the human host. In this study we selected the putative ZnuD1 outer membrane receptor from A. baumannii as a target for vaccine development. Due to challenges in production of an integral outer membrane protein for vaccine production, we adopted a recently described hybrid antigen approach in which surface epitopes from the Neisseria meningitidis TbpA receptor protein were displayed on a derivative of the C-lobe of the surface lipoprotein TbpB, named the loopless C-lobe (LCL). A structural model for ZnuD1 was generated and four surface loops were selected for hybrid antigen production by computational approaches. Hybrid antigens were designed displaying the four selected loops (2,5,7 and 11) individually or together in a single hybrid antigen. The hybrid antigens along with ZnuD1 and the LCL scaffold were produced in the E. coli cytoplasm either as soluble antigens or as inclusion bodies, that were used to generate soluble antigens upon refolding. Mice were immunized with the hybrid antigens, ZnuD1or LCL and then used in an A. baumannii sepsis model to evaluate their ability to protect against infection. As expected, the LCL scaffold did not induce a protective immune response, enabling us to attribute observed protection to the displayed loops. Immunization with the refolded ZnuD1 protein protected 63% of the mice while immunization with hybrid antigens displaying individual loops achieved between 25 and 50% protection. Notably, the mice immunized with the hybrid antigen displaying the four loops were completely protected from infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".