Limits of adiabatic clocking in quantum-dot cellular automata
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultimate bounds on the maximum operating frequency of networks of Quantum-dot Cellular Automata (QCA) devices have yet to be established. We consider the adiabaticity of such networks in the two-state approximation where clocking is achieved via modulation of the interdot tunneling barriers. Estimates of the maximum operating frequency that would allow a 99% probability of observing the correct logical output are presented for a subset of the basic components used in QCA network design. Simulations are performed both in the coherent limit and for a simple dissipative model. We approach the problem of tunnel-based clocking from the perspective of quantum annealing and present an improved clocking schedule allowing for faster operation. Using an analytical solution for driven QCA wires, we show that the maximum operating frequency in the coherent limit falls off with the square of the wire length, potentially limiting the size of clocked regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it