Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les théologiens et mystiques chrétiens, notamment au Moyen Âge, ne sont guère enclins à approuver le rire. Dans ses manifestations corporelles hybristiques, ils voient le diable incarné. Dès lors, est-il le rire anti-mystique, le rire de mauvaise foi ? Pourtant, si l’on s’en tient à la figure biblique d’Isaac ou à saint François d’Assise, le rire est un don de Dieu. Il est joie et foi. Disposition singulière du corps que le mystique éprouve, il conduit à l’extase et à l’abandon de soi. C’est paradoxalement à travers « l’athéologie rieuse » de Georges Bataille que le rire est le mieux analysé dans sa dimension mystique. Finalement, comprendre le rire et la mystique, ne suppose-t-il pas de se détacher d’une représentation ascétique désincarnée qui conditionne pour partie la théologie chrétienne ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".