MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005203554 · doi:10.1089/bfm.2019.29141.hmj

ABM Clinical Protocol #32: Management of Hyperlactation

2020· article· en· W3005203554 on OpenAlexaff
Helen M. Johnson, Anne Eglash, Katrina B. Mitchell, Kathy Leeper, Christina Smillie, Lindsay Moore-Ostby, Nadine Manson, Liliana Simon, Michal Young, Larry Noble, Melissa Bartick, Sarah Calhoun, Megan Elliott-Rudder, Lori Feldman‐Winter, Laura R. Kair, Susan Lappin, Ilse Larson, Ruth A. Lawrence, Yvonne LeFort, Kathleen A. Marinelli, Nicole Marshall, Catherine Murak, Eliza Myers, Sarah Reece-Stremtan, Casey Rosen‐Carole, Susan Rothenberg, Tricia Schmidt, Tomoko Seo, Natasha K. Sriraman, Elizabeth K. Stehel, Nancy Wight, Adora Wonodi

Bibliographic record

VenueBreastfeeding Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingMedicineProtocol (science)Breast feedingNursingFamily medicineAlternative medicinePediatricsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A central goal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine is the development of clinical protocols for managing common medical problems that may impact breastfeeding success. These protocols serve only as guidelines for the care of breast-feeding mothers and infants and do not delineate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as standards of medical care. Variations in treatment may be appropriate according to the needs of an individual patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1360.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBreastfeeding MedicineSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207