MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005215326 · doi:10.35767/gscpgbull.67.2.71

High-frequency sequences, paleogeography, and syn-depositional tectonism on a shallow clastic ramp: Doe Creek and Pouce Coupe members of the Late Cenomanian Kaskapau Formation, Western Canada Foreland Basin

2019· article· en· W3005215326 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
A. Guy Plint, Michael A. Kreitner

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsHusky Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFaciesMarine transgressionPaleontologyTrace fossilClastic rockIchnofaciesSedimentary depositional environmentForeland basinCenomanianDiamictiteSedimentary rockStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The great Late Cenomanian transgression of the Greenhorn Sea is recorded in western Alberta and adjacacent British Columbia by shallow-marine deposits of the lower Kaskapau Formation that blanket underlying deltaic deposits of the Dunvegan Formation. Overlying the basal ‘A-X unit’ of the Kaskapau are the allostratigraphically-defined Doe Creek and Pouce Coupe units, each of which forms a SW-thickening wedge up to about 100 m thick. The Doe Creek and Pouce Coupe units comprise, respectively, 10 and 8 allomembers, each defined by a marine flooding surface. Doe Creek facies are organized in upward-shoaling successions less than about 10 m thick. Shallow-water marginal-marine facies prevail in the west and north, with transgressive mudstones overlain by thin, sharp-based shoreface sandstones that, in places, contain roots and dinosaur tracks. In some instances, marine mudstone grades directly upward into a rooted, muddy paleosol. Mapped regionally, these facies define a broad, shallow, SE-facing embayment approximately 200 x 200 km. Trace and molluscan fossils suggest that salinity was below normal marine level, and benthic fauna were, at times, stressed by high turbidity and sedimentation rate. The central part of the embayment is dominated by offshore mudstone that encloses isolated, sharp-based lenticular bodies of clean sandstone up to 9 m thick. Sandstones are ovoid to elongate in plan view, and commonly extend many tens of km N-S or NE-SW. These sandstones are interpreted as top-truncated lowstand delta and strandplain deposits that became isolated on the outer ramp following marine transgression. The sharp base of most shoreface sandstones implies that deposition took place during relative sea-level fall. All Doe Creek allomembers thicken into the foredeep, with the tectonically-flexed surface inclined to the SW. Palaeogeographic maps show, however, that lowstand shorelines were oriented approximately NE-SW, and that the depositional surface sloped to the SE. This geometric relationship implies that, despite tectonic subsidence increasing to the SW, the rate of sediment supply and efficiency of redistribution were able to maintain a wave-graded surface sloping to the SE. Because shorelines migrated across, rather than up and down tectonic dip, allomembers are interpreted to have been controlled primarily by high-rate, high-frequency eustatic cycles, rather than by tectonic movements. The Pouce Coupe unit represents a complete reversal of basin paleogeography relative to the Doe Creek. Pouce Coupe shoreface sandstones are stacked in a linear belt just west of 120°W and grade westward into offshore muddy facies that thicken to the WSW. The entire unit is truncated eastward by the K1 unconformity and is absent over most of Alberta. It is postulated that the Proterozoic Kiskatinaw domain acted as a crustal weak zone, forming a hinge that defined the eastern margin of the Pouce Coupe flexural depocentre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.145
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologySame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207