MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005238328 · doi:10.1063/1.5134460

A numerical study for thermocapillary induced patterning of thin liquid films

2020· article· en· W3005238328 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNanopillarLubricationWavelengthPhysicsMarangoni effectMechanicsMicrochannelThermalTemperature gradientLubrication theoryThermal conductivityOpticsThin filmThermodynamicsConvection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The underlying mechanism of thermal induced patterning is investigated using a numerical phase-field model. Research on the subject has been mostly restricted to lubrication approximation, which is only valid for the cases that the initial film thickness is smaller than the characteristic wavelength of induced instabilities. Since the long-wave approximation is no longer valid in the later stages of pattern evolution, we employed the full governing equations of fluid flow and the thermally induced Marangoni effect to track the interface between the polymer film and the air bounding layer. Conducting a systematic study on the impact of influential parameters, we found that an increase in the temperature gradient, thermal conductivity ratio, and initial thickness of the thin film resulted in shorter processing time and faster pattern formation. Additionally, the contact angle between the polymer film and the bounding plates showed a significant effect on the shape of created features. Compared to the reported experimental observation by Dietzel and Troian [“Mechanism for spontaneous growth of nanopillar arrays in ultrathin films subject to a thermal gradient,” J. Appl. Phys. 108, 074308 (2010)], our numerical modeling provided a more accurate prediction of the characteristic wavelength against the linearized model currently used in the literature. The numerical findings in this study provide valuable insight into thermal-induced patterning, which can be a useful guide for future experimental works.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it