MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005289547 · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2020.2971238

Large-Pitch Synthetic Transmit Aperture Imaging: A Feasibility Study

2020· article· en· W3005289547 on OpenAlexafffund
Ying Li, Michael C. Kolios, Yuan Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarComputer scienceRemote sensingComputer visionGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 3-D or large-aperture 2-D synthetic transmit aperture (STA) ultrasound imaging system with a fully sampled array usually leads to high hardware complexity and cost since each element in the array is individually controlled.To reduce the hardware complexity,we propose a large-pitch method for STA (LPSTA) imaging integrated with a spatial response function (SRF) in the image reconstruction to improve image quality. To achieve this, we decreased the total number of measurement channels M (the product of the number of transmissions IT and the number of the receive channels in each transmission IR). We combined L adjacent elements in transmission and Kadjacent elements in receive into subapertures (SAPs), where L and K were coprime (no common factors) integers to suppress the grating lobes. We denoted it as an (N/L, N/K) system, where N is the number of transducer elements. In this article, first, we derived the beam pattern of the LPSTA using a far-field approximation. We demonstrated that the coprime selection and SRF can significantly reduce the grating lobes level (GLL) by using a beam pattern analysis. We also found that the LPSTA can have a similar beam pattern as that of a full array when the target is located along the steering direction. Second, the imaging performance of LPSTA was evaluated and validated with Field II simulations and experiments. The simulation results demonstrated that the proposed LPSTA with (N/3, N/5) can achieve on average ~25% improvement in lateral resolution, ~24.6% and ~42.3% improvement in contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and contrast ratio (CR), respectively, over B-mode with a large-pitch receiver with (N, N/5). LPSTA achieved comparable image contrast to the standard STA with the full array (N, N) at the cost of a reduced field of view. The experiment results were consistent with the simulation results. Finally, in addition to reducing the system (hardware) complexity, the LPSTA was more computationally efficient than the standard STA with a full array. The proposed method may help in realizing clinical applications of real-time 2-D or 3-D ultrasound imaging using large arrays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency ControlSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207