MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005335103 · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.01.008

A Systematic Review of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Erectile Dysfunction After Prostatectomy and Recommendations to Guide Further Research

2020· review· en· W3005335103 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsBC StudiesCenterLine (Canada)University of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstatectomyPelvic Floor MuscleErectile dysfunctionPelvic floorCINAHLRandomized controlled trialPhysical therapyMEDLINEUrologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryProstate cancerPsychological interventionInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction is one potential complication after radical prostatectomy; often pelvic floor muscle training is offered as an intervention to improve quality of life and erectile function post-operatively. AIM: To provide a summary of current evidence regarding the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training in the management of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy and provide recommendations for future research. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted for relevant research studies using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline, and PEDro. Quality of selected trials was assessed by 2 independent reviewers using the Modified Downs and Black Checklist; disagreements were resolved by consensus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure is the International Index of Erectile function (IIEF-5). RESULTS: 9 studies of various study design were included in this review. Most studies demonstrated improvements in erectile dysfunction with pelvic floor muscle training; however, lack of methodological rigor for several studies and variability among training protocols limited interpretation of results. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Further well powered and rigorously designed randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the effect of pelvic floor muscle training on erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This review employed a systematic method of appraising the available evidence for pelvic floor muscle training for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Limited high-quality articles were identified and few conclusions could be drawn from the existing evidence. CONCLUSION: Future high-quality randomized controlled trials should include strategies to improve adherence to exercise, clearly describe exercise protocols, and integrate new evidence for verbal cues and biofeedback for muscles involved in erection. Wong C, Louie DR, Beach C. A Systematic Review of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Erectile Dysfunction After Prostatectomy and Recommendations to Guide Further Research. J Sex Med 2020;17:737-748.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it