Minimum material quality threshold for intermediate band solar cells using a multi-band device simulator with fully coupled optics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intermediate band (IB) solar cells hold the promise of efficiency as high as triple-junction solar cells with much simpler cell design, containing only two semiconductor material interfaces. Though several intermediate band materials have been demonstrated, no cells have shown promising efficiencies. Many of the fundamental required properties of IB materials are well known: they should have strong subgap absorption, long carrier lifetimes, and good carrier mobilities. The tradeoffs between these properties, however, are not well understood. We present the first results using a new coupled Poisson/drift-diffusion model designed for IB materials, called Simudo. We perform a systematic study of a figure of merit for IB materials. We consider the standard p-IB-n architecture with a high density IB, in which two depletion junctions are formed. Considering fictitious materials with identical electron and hole properties (i.e., mobilities, capture cross sections), we show that this simple figure of merit provides a necessary condition for making efficient devices. Further, we show for the first time a threshold behavior, where the efficiency of the IB device exceeds that of the standard pn-junction only for sufficiently high quality material. These results both give guidance for experiments about required IB material properties and demonstrate how detailed device modeling can aid in the design of IB devices, for example by choosing layer thicknesses optimally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".