MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005368533 · doi:10.1107/s2056989020001413

Bulky 2,6-disubstituted aryl siloxanes and a disilanamine

2020· article· en· W3005368533 on OpenAlexafffund
Flávia Marszaukowski, Karen Wohnrath, Renè T. Boeré

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsChemistryTrimethylsilylSteric effectsArylBenzeneAlkylMoleculeMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryCrystal structureCrystallographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structures of 5-bromo-1,3-di- tert- butyl-2-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]benzene, C 17 H 29 BrOSi, (I), 1,3-di- tert- butyl-2-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]benzene, C 17 H 30 OSi, (II), and N -(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-1,1,1-trimethyl- N -(trimethylsilyl)silanamine, C 18 H 35 NSi 2 , (III), are reported. Compound (I) crystallizes in space group P 2 1 / c with Z ′ = 1, (II) in Pnma with Z ′ = 0.5 and (III) in Cmcm with Z ′ = 0.25. Consequently, the molecules of (II) are constrained by m and those of (III) by m 2 m site symmetries. Despite this, both (I) and (II) are distorted towards mild boat conformations, as is typical of 2,6-di- tert- butyl-substituted phenyl compounds, reflecting the high local steric pressure of the flanking alkyl groups. Compound (III) by contrast is planar and symmetric, and this lack of distortion is compatible with the lower steric pressure of the flanking 2,6-diisopropyl substituents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compoundsFrench-language works237,207