MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005373687 · doi:10.1002/tbio.201900032

Evaluation of a Ruthenium coordination complex as photosensitizer for PDT of bladder cancer: Cellular response, tissue selectivity and in vivo response

2020· article· en· W3005373687 on OpenAlexaff
Lothar Lilge, Mark Roufaiel, Savo Lazic, Pavel Kaspler, Manjunatha Ankathatti Munegowda, Mark Nitz, Jay Bassan, Arkady Mandel

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Biophotonics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrotheliumIn vivoPhotosensitizerIn vitroBladder cancerPhotodynamic therapyChemistryNecrosisUrinary bladderCancer researchPathologyUrologyCancerMedicineInternal medicineBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract TLD1433, a Ru(II) polypyridyl complex, was recently introduced. It can be activated in the 520 to 540 nm range. Here we report on the use of TLD1433 for the treatment of bladder carcinomas in vitro and in an in vivo orthotopic model. The electrostatic properties of the normal urothelium vs a tumor compromised urothelium provide for a high selective uptake ratio. In vitro, a 1000 difference in the LD 50 between dark and 22.5 J cm −2 irradiation at 530 nm was achieved for two bladder cell lines (T24 and AY‐27). In dogs and rats the plasma concentration for TLD1433 was below 100 ng kg −1 at 72 hours following intravenous injection at a dose of up to 3.5 mg kg −1 and below 10 ng kg −1 following intrabladder instillation for 1 hour at a concentration of 6 mg mL −1 . Successful tumor necrosis close to 1.5 mm in depth was achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational BiophotonicsSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207