MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005419361 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23721

New insight about the relationship between the main characteristics of precursor materials and activated carbon properties using multivariate analysis

2020· article· en· W3005419361 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mateus Pereira Flores Santos, Josiane F. Silva, Rafael da Costa Ilhéu Fontan, Renata Cristina Ferreira Bonomo, Leandro Soares Santos, Cristiane Martins Veloso

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLigninCelluloseCarbon fibersActivated carbonMaterials scienceMultivariate statisticsChemical engineeringCharacterization (materials science)Volume (thermodynamics)Principal component analysisOrganic chemistryChemistryComposite materialNanotechnologyMathematicsAdsorptionComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Agro‐industrial wastes are used as carbon precursors in the production of activated carbon because they are rich in lignocellulosic materials. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the main characteristics of precursor materials and activated carbons by multivariate analysis. After characterization of the precursor materials and their respective carbons, the principal component analysis and canonical correlation analysis were performed. Materials with cellulose/lignin ratio > 3.0 led to the production of carbons with a higher pore diameter, while materials with a cellulose/lignin ratio ≤ 1.0 led to a low pore volume. Using the mathematical models obtained, it is possible to predict the carbon characteristics using only the composition data of the lignocellulosic materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesFrench-language works237,207