Teorías constructivistas, perspectiva funcional-estructural en el aprendizaje del fútbol base (Constructivist theories, functional-structural perspective in learning in initiation to football)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se presenta una revisión teórica de los estudios que se han realizado en fútbol desde el paradigma cognitivo. El artículo pretende argumentar la necesidad de distinguir bajo el paradigma cognitivo, dos líneas de trabajo diferentes ya que se pretende desarrollar la toma de conciencia en las acciones de juego. No es lo mismo enfocar un entrenamiento bajo las teorías del procesamiento de la información (perspectiva estructural-funcional), que bajo las teorías constructivistas (perspectiva funcional-estructural), centrando el interés en el conocimiento previo del jugador, el desarrollo evolutivo, la categoría y los distintos niveles de pensamiento. Por tanto se pretende bajo el paradigma cognitivo, teorías constructivistas, perspectiva funcional-estructural, dar respuesta a un modelo de aprendizaje en fútbol base eficaz, efectivo y eficiente, transferible a cualquier deporte de invasión.Abstract: A theoretical review was carried out in football under the cognitive paradigm. The article aims at demonstrating the need to distinguish two different lines of work under the cognitive paradigm as we try and develop awareness in game actions. It is very different to build a training through the framework of the theories of information processing (structural-functional perspective), or through constructivist theories (functional-structural perspective), which focus on players’ knowledge, development, division, and different levels of awareness. Thus, within the cognitive paradigm, constructivist theories, and functional-structural perspective, we intend to respond to an effective, efficacious, and efficient initiation-to-football training model, transferable to any invasion sport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".