MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005455608 · doi:10.1139/geomat-2020-0001

Correction: The U.S. is replacing NAD83 with NATRF2022: what this means for Canada

2019· article· en· W3005455608 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Caroline Erickson, Geoff Banham, Ron Berg, Joey Chessie, M. Craymer, Brian Donahue, Renée Tardif, Yves Thériault, M. Véronneau

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOMATICA · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)Government of New BrunswickUniversity of New BrunswickNatural Resources CanadaAlberta Environment and Protected AreasMinistry of Transportation of OntarioGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorth American Datum of 1927GeographyCartographyGeodetic datumGeodesyRegional scienceLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0110.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueGEOMATICASame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207