Temperature and electric field distributions along a form wound coil of an inverter-fed rotating machine with micro-varistor stress grading system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Temperature and electric field along the stress grading system of a form wound coil under repetitive impulse voltage are studied using 2D axisymmetric and 3D models in COMSOL̅ 5.3a. The validity of the 3D model is shown by comparing the results with the measured temperature profile along the stress grading system. The evaluation of both temperature and electric field shows that using a stress grading system based on a micro-varistor characteristic reduces the maximum temperature; however, with an increase in the electric field, which can be reduced to an acceptable level. An optimization on the initial conductivity of the micro-varistor characteristic confirms that desired electric field and temperature rise are achievable by selecting an optimized conductivity characteristic. 2D and 3D simulations show that a proposed stress grading system, which is a combination of an optimized stress grading tape conductivity and minimum conductive armor tape length, has a good temperature and electrical performances under repetitive impulse voltage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".