MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005517302 · doi:10.1109/tap.2020.2969843

Mode Composite Sandwich Slot Line and its Applications in Antenna Development

2020· article· en· W3005517302 on OpenAlexaff
Yihong Su, Xian Qi Lin, Yong Fan, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBroadbandTransmission lineAntenna (radio)Composite numberPlanarMaterials scienceMode (computer interface)Electrical conductorElectronic circuitSlot antennaLine (geometry)Computer scienceOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsDirectional antennaEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a class of mode composite transmission line called mode composite sandwich slot line (MCSSL) is proposed, studied, and demonstrated. The MCSSL is composed of two substrate integrated waveguides (SIWs) and a sandwiched quasi-slot line. Structural parts of the two SIWs inherently serve as the two conductors of the quasi-slot line. The SIW supports the TE10 fundamental mode propagation, whereas the quasi-TEM mode is supported by the quasi-slot line. Two types of transition structures are proposed in this article, which enable an easier integration of the studied MCSSL with other transmission lines. An MCSSL-based antenna is designed and fabricated to theoretically and experimentally demonstrate its advantages and feasibility. It has been shown that the MCSSL features the physical and electrical characteristics of a joint structure (or structure sharing) in connection with a mode composite with planar structures, and it can find applications in broadband and multiband circuits and antenna developments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207