MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3005518478 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/q4u8h

Donald T. Stuss Obituary, Canadian Psychology

2020· preprint· en· W3005518478 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fergus I. M. Craik, Brian Levine

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObituaryFeelingNeuropsychologyPsychologyClinical neuropsychologyCognitionPsychoanalysisPolitical scienceSocial psychologyPsychiatryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presents an obituary for Donald T. Stuss (1941–2019). The work of Donald T. Stuss, OC, FRSC, who died in Toronto on September 3, 2019, of complications following pancreatic cancer was world-leading but also notable for his influence on the landscape of Canadian neuroscience. Don worked as a teacher and football coach at high schools in Ontario before returning to the University of Ottawa to pursue graduate studies in psychology; he obtained his PhD in 1976. After a postdoctoral position at the Boston VA Medical Center, Don returned to Ottawa to pursue neuropsychological research at the university and also clinical work at the Ottawa General Hospital, where he served as director of clinical neuropsychological services from 1978 to 1989 and wrote the seminal volume The Frontal Lobes with Frank Benson (Stuss & Benson, 1986). Don had three major research interests in his scientific career: first, the functions of the frontal lobes and their role in cognitive processes, conscious awareness, and feelings of self; second, the effects of traumatic brain injury on these functions; and third, improving clinical approaches to assessment and rehabilitation. Each of these was grounded in Don’s thinking about functions of the frontal lobes in enabling cognitive processes and experiences in the normal adult, as well as how these functions are affected by focal and diffuse damage. Don’s success and influence as a researcher and scientific manager earned him many accolades and prestigious marks of recognition. These included being president of the International Neuropsychological Society, a member of the Order of Ontario, a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, and an Officer in the Order of Canada. Donald Stuss was a great neuropsychologist and also a great Canadian. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1110.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.230
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→