MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3005537737 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2019-0131

Tectonic domains and exhumation history of the Omineca Belt in southeastern British Columbia from <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar thermochronology

2020· article· en· W3005537737 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ewan Russell Webster, Douglas A. Archibald, David R.M. Pattison, Jessica A. Pickett, Joel C. Jansen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPlutonHornblendeZirconThermochronologyMuscoviteBiotiteMonaziteGeochemistryBatholithCretaceousFission track datingClosure temperatureTectonicsPaleontologyQuartz

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A large geochronological data set comprising 40Ar/39Ar and K–Ar (hornblende, muscovite, biotite, and K-feldspar), Rb–Sr (muscovite), fission track (zircon and apatite) and U–Pb (zircon and monazite) dates has been compiled for the southern Kootenay Arc and western Purcell anticlinorium in the Omineca Belt of the Canadian Cordillera in southeastern British Columbia. New 40Ar/39Ar data for hornblende, muscovite, biotite, and alkali feldspar are presented and combined with data from other studies. We integrate these data with recent advances in the geology of the region to define three partially fault-bounded domains with differing geological and exhumation histories, here termed the western, central, and eastern domains. The western domain is characterized by (1) late synkinematic Jurassic plutons with hornblende, muscovite, and biotite 40Ar/39Ar plateau dates between 170 and 165 Ma, some of which are within error of the U–Pb zircon dates for these plutons, and (2) late Early Cretaceous (118–102 Ma) plutons commonly with concordant mica 40Ar/39Ar plateau dates of a similar age range, indicating rapid cooling following emplacement of both suites. The central domain is bounded by regional-scale normal faults (Gallagher and Midge Creek faults, Blazed Creek/Next Creek faults, and Purcell Trench fault) and contains superposed Early and Late Cretaceous zones of Barrovian metamorphic rocks and several mid- to Late Cretaceous, post-kinematic plutons. The transition from the western domain into the central domain is characterized by 40Ar/39Ar mica age spectra showing a progression of increasing thermal overprinting. Along the north–south length of the central domain, biotite and muscovite yield Paleocene to Eocene K–Ar and 40Ar/39Ar plateau dates between 66 and 40 Ma. The eastern domain consists of (1) a southern portion that occurs in the hanging wall of the Purcell Trench fault, comprising mid-Cretaceous intrusions of the Bayonne magmatic suite emplaced into biotite zone metasedimentary rocks of the Mesoproterozoic Belt-Purcell Supergroup in the western Purcell anticlinorium, and (2) a northern portion that shows a continuous transition with the northern part of the central domain north of the terminus of the Purcell Trench fault. Cretaceous igneous rocks in the southern portion of the eastern and western domains have 40Ar/39Ar mica plateau dates that are <9 Myr younger than U–Pb zircon dates, indicating rapid cooling shortly after emplacement. 40Ar/39Ar step-heating reveals that there was a mid- to Late Cretaceous thermal disturbance in the eastern domain, possibly related to emplacement of younger plutons at deeper crustal levels and the Late Cretaceous Barrovian metamorphic event recorded in rocks of the central domain, such that biotite with dates

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→