SISTEM PAKAR MENDIAGNOSA PENYAKIT GIGI MENGGUNAKAN METODE CERTAINTY FACTOR
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expert system is a computer-based application that is used to solve problems as thought by experts. One problem that can be solved by using an expert system is diagnosing.Teeth are one of the most important organs in the human body. As the only organ that cannot heal itself, the tooth becomes an organ that is highly maintained and cared for during one's life. The teeth are also very important organs in the food processing process. In this study the user chose one of three types of dental disease as their assumptions including periodontitis, gingivitis and dental caries. The system will give questions about the symptoms of dental disease. The certainty factor value of the three types of dental diseases based on user input is 95.9% of gingivitis, 92.7% of periodontitis and 85.9% of dental caries. So it can be concluded that the calculation results indicate the likelihood of users suffering from gingivitis 95.9%. Henceforth the system will provide a handling solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it