Controlling the null photonic gap and zero refractive index in photonic superlattices with temperature-controllable-refractive-index materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Temperature-adjustable optical properties of two types of one-dimensional photonic superlattices made from lithium niobate or liquid crystal are theoretically investigated. The control of band structures and density of states is achieved through the temperature with various values of refractive index, layer width, and propagation wavelength. It is presented that a null photonic gap appears at certain temperature points, which are decided by the ratio of layer width and the refractive index. It is shown that the spatial average of the wave vector ⟨ k ⟩ vanishes at a specific temperature as functions of the layer thickness and refractive index. The values of the temperature corresponding to zero-refractive-index (zero- ⟨ n ⟩ ) are demonstrated to be suppressed when the refractive index or the ratio of the layer width is enhanced. Null photonic gap and zero- ⟨ n ⟩ can appear simultaneously at certain wavelengths in the range of visible light, which can be modulated by the temperature. This implies the importance of one-dimensional photonic superlattices made from temperature-controllable-refractive-index materials for many important practical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".