MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005597534 · doi:10.1364/josab.384702

Controlling the null photonic gap and zero refractive index in photonic superlattices with temperature-controllable-refractive-index materials

2020· article· en· W3005597534 on OpenAlexaff
Ye Wu, Pengfei Ou, Ling Zhang, Yingcheng Lin, Jiquan Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America B · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology
KeywordsRefractive indexSuperlatticePhotonicsMaterials scienceZero (linguistics)Index (typography)OptoelectronicsPhotonic crystalOpticsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temperature-adjustable optical properties of two types of one-dimensional photonic superlattices made from lithium niobate or liquid crystal are theoretically investigated. The control of band structures and density of states is achieved through the temperature with various values of refractive index, layer width, and propagation wavelength. It is presented that a null photonic gap appears at certain temperature points, which are decided by the ratio of layer width and the refractive index. It is shown that the spatial average of the wave vector <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:math> vanishes at a specific temperature as functions of the layer thickness and refractive index. The values of the temperature corresponding to zero-refractive-index (zero- <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) are demonstrated to be suppressed when the refractive index or the ratio of the layer width is enhanced. Null photonic gap and zero- <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> can appear simultaneously at certain wavelengths in the range of visible light, which can be modulated by the temperature. This implies the importance of one-dimensional photonic superlattices made from temperature-controllable-refractive-index materials for many important practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America BSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207