MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005641490 · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00035

Pre-frontal Cortex Oxygenation Changes During Aerobic Exercise in Elite Athletes Experiencing Sport-Related Concussion

2020· article· en· W3005641490 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Patrick Neary, Carolynn M. Dude, Jyotpal Singh, Trevor K. Len, Yagesh Bhambhani

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Human Neuroscience · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMoncton HospitalUniversity of Regina
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsConcussionAthletesAerobic exerciseMedicinePhysical therapyHemodynamicsAnalysis of varianceRepeated measures designIncremental exerciseElite athletesPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyPsychologyInternal medicinePoison controlHeart rateBlood pressureInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: Recent research suggests that aerobic exercise can be performed safely within the first week following concussion injury, and that early initiation of exercise may speed recovery. To better understand the physiological changes during concussion, we tested the hypothesis that mild-to-intense exercise testing can be performed within days immediately following injury, and can be used to discern differences between the concussed and normal healthy state. Thus, the purpose was to observe the cerebral haemodynamic responses to incremental exercise testing performed acutely post-concussion in high performance athletes. Methods: This study was a within- and between-experimental design, with seven male university ice hockey teams participating. A subgroup of 5 players acted as control subjects (CON) and were tested at the same time as the 14 concussed (mTBI) players on Day 2, 4, and 7 post-concussion. A five-minute resting baseline, and five-minute exercise bouts of mild (EX1), moderate (EX2), and high (EX3) intensity exercise was performed on a cycle ergometer. Near infrared spectroscopy was used to monitor pre-frontal cortex oxy-haemoglobin (HbO2), deoxy-haemoglobin (HHb), and total blood volume (tHb) changes. Results: ANOVA compared differences between testing days and groups, and although large percentage changes in HbO2 (20-30%), HHb (30-40%), and tHb (30-40%) were recorded, no significant (p≤0.05) differences in cerebral haemodynamics occurred between mTBI vs. CON during aerobic exercise testing on any day post-injury. Furthermore, there was a linear relationship between exercise intensity vs. cerebral haemodynamics during testing for each day (r2=0.83-0.99). Conclusion: These results demonstrate two novel findings: 1) mild-to-intense aerobic exercise testing can be performed safely as early as Day 2 post-concussion injury in a controlled laboratory environment, and 2) evidence-based objective measures such as cerebral hemodynamics can easily be collected using NIRS to monitor physiological changes during the first week post-injury. This research has important implications for monitoring physiological recovery post-injury, and establishing new rehabilitation guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.846

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Human NeuroscienceSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207