MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005647066 · doi:10.1109/tmm.2020.2973855

Mobile Streaming of Live 360-Degree Videos

2020· article· en· W3005647066 on OpenAlexafffund
Omar Eltobgy, Omar Arafa, Mohamed Hefeeda

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Multimedia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceViewportMulticastUnicastTestbedQuality of experienceComputer networkScalabilityCellular networkMultimediaVideo qualityMobile deviceDistributed computingQuality of serviceMetric (unit)World Wide WebOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Live streaming of immersive multimedia content, e.g., 360-degree videos, is getting popular due to the recent availability of commercial devices that support interacting with such content such as smartphones/tablets and head-mounted displays. Streaming live content to mobile users using individual connections (i.e., unicast) consumes substantial network resources and does not scale to large number of users. Multicast, on the other hand, offers a scalable solution but it introduces multiple challenges, including handling user interactivity, ensuring smooth quality, conserving the energy of mobile receivers, and achieving fairness among users. We propose a new solution for the problem of live multicast streaming of 360-degree videos to mobile users, which addresses the aforementioned challenges. The proposed solution, referred to as VRCast, is designed for cellular networks that support multicast, such as LTE. We show through trace-driven simulations that VRCast outperforms the closest algorithms in the literature by wide margins across several performance metrics. For example, compared to the state-of-the-art, VRCast improves the viewport quality by up to 2.5 dB. We have implemented VRCast in an LTE testbed to show its practicality. Our experimental results show that VRCast ensures smooth video quality and saves energy for mobile devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MultimediaSame topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207