MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005664219

FRP보강시스템에 의한 철근콘크리트보의 보강설계에 관한 연구

2019· article· ko· W3005664219 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue복합신소재구조학회 논문집 · 2019
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet of Things and Social Network Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibre-reinforced plasticEngineeringStructural engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

본 논문은 FRP보강시스템에 의한 철근콘크리트보의 보강설계에 대하여 소개하고 있고 ISIS CANADA-Design Manual No. 4(2001) 및 KCI-2012의 설계 코드를 고려하여 연구가 수행되었다. FRP보강시스템에 의한 철근콘크리트보의 보강 설계순서도가 제시되었으며, 보강설계해석프로그램을 소개하였다. 연구의 검증은 참고문헌과의 비교를 통해서 이루어졌다. 또한, 복철근 직사각형 보와 T형보의 정밀 분석을 통하여 보강 설계 순서도를 수정, 보완하는 경우를 제시하였다. 구조설계자는 본 프로그램을 이용하여 FRP보강시스템에 의한 노후 철근콘크리트보의 보강설계를 쉽게 수행할 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구가 FRP보강시스템의 최적화된 설계 및 제작 등에 실질적인 지침서가 될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it