The power and limitations of gene expression pathway analyses toward predicting population response to environmental stressors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rapid environmental changes impact the global distribution and abundance of species, highlighting the urgency to understand and predict how populations will respond. The analysis of differentially expressed genes has elucidated areas of the genome involved in adaptive divergence to past and present environmental change. Such studies however have been hampered by large numbers of differentially expressed genes and limited knowledge of how these genes work in conjunction with each other. Recent methods (broadly termed “pathway analyses”) have emerged that aim to group genes that behave in a coordinated fashion to a factor of interest. These methods aid in functional annotation and uncovering biological pathways, thereby collapsing complex datasets into more manageable units, providing more nuanced understandings of both the organism‐level effects of modified gene expression, and the targets of adaptive divergence. Here, we reanalyze a dataset that investigated temperature‐induced changes in gene expression in marine‐adapted and freshwater‐adapted threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), using Weighted Gene Co‐expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) with PANTHER Gene Ontology (GO)‐Slim overrepresentation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis. Six modules exhibited a conserved response and six a divergent response between marine and freshwater stickleback when acclimated to 7°C or 22°C. One divergent module showed freshwater‐specific response to temperature, and the remaining divergent modules showed differences in height of reaction norms. PPARAa, a transcription factor that regulates fatty acid metabolism and has been implicated in adaptive divergence, was located in a module that had higher expression at 7°C and in freshwater stickleback. This updated methodology revealed patterns that were not found in the original publication. Although such methods hold promise toward predicting population response to environmental stressors, many limitations remain, particularly with regard to module expression representation, database resources, and cross‐database integration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".