MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005755027 · doi:10.4000/rdr.881

La religion dans les décisions relatives à la santé et à l’éducation des enfants en droit canadien et québécois

2017· article· fr· W3005755027 on OpenAlexaffabout
José Woehrling

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du droit des religions · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cette contribution, l’auteur examine les règles de droit canadien et québécois qui encadrent la prise en compte de la religion dans les décisions relatives à la santé et à l’éducation des enfants, décisions habituellement prises par les parents et parfois par les enfants eux-mêmes. Les lois adoptées dans ce domaine par le Parlement fédéral et les législatures provinciales, les lois québécoises faisant l’objet d’une attention particulière, peuvent être contestées comme ne respectant pas les droits constitutionnels des intéressés, tant les parents que les enfants. On évoquera donc les principales décisions de la Cour suprême du Canada dans lesquelles la Cour a été amenée à mettre en balance les droits des parents et ceux des enfants et à concilier le degré d’autonomie décisionnelle du mineur et la protection de sa vie et de sa santé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue du droit des religionsSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207