Extraction of Protein Dynamics Information Hidden in Cryogenic Electron Microscopy Maps Using Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Technical breakthroughs in cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM)-based single-particle analysis have enabled the structures of numerous proteins to be solved at atomic or near-atomic resolutions, including extremely large macromolecules whose structures could not be solved by conventional techniques. Determining the dynamics properties of these macromolecules, based on their solved structures, can further improve our understanding of their functional mechanisms. However, such analysis is often hampered by the large molecular size and complex structural assembly, making both experimental and computational approaches to determine dynamics properties challenging. Here, we report a deep learning-based approach, DEFMap, to extract the dynamics information “hidden” in cryo-EM density maps. By relying only on cryo-EM maps, DEFMap successfully provided dynamics information equivalent to that determined from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and experimental approaches at the atomic and residue levels. Additionally, DEFMap could detect dynamics changes associated with molecular recognition and the accompanying allosteric conformational stabilizations, which trigger various biological events such as signal transduction and enzyme catalysis. This approach will provide new insights into the functional mechanisms of biological molecules, accelerating modern molecular biology researches. Furthermore, this advanced strategy combining experimental data, deep learning approaches, and MD simulations would open a new multidisciplinary science area
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".