MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005774701 · doi:10.1080/24748706.2020.1717272

Hydrodynamic Assessment of a Small Intestinal Submucosa Tubular Mitral Valve

2020· article· en· W3005774701 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Asad Mirza, Chia-Pei Denise Hsu, Robert G. Matheny, Sharan Ramaswamy

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Heart · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyRegurgitation (circulation)Mitral valveInternal medicineDiastoleBiomedical engineeringAortic valveStroke volumeMitral valve regurgitationBlood pressureHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: For young children with critical valve defects, and for older patients who are contra-indicated for receiving mechanical and bioprosthetic valves, treatment options are extremely limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether tubular porcine small intestinal submucosa (PSIS) bio-scaffold valves can facilitate robust mitral valvular hydrodynamic function and serves as a potential treatment option for the aforementioned patient sub-sets. Methods: A 26-mm PSIS tubular valve (CorMatrix Cardiovascular Inc., Roswell, GA) was sutured to a custom, 3-D printed valve holder along its ring and its two posts on the distal end (150° separation distance; Fig. 1A). Hydrodynamic testing was performed using a pulse duplicator system (Vivitro Labs Inc., Victoria, BC, Canada) filled with 0.9% saline solution, with the PSIS valve mounted in the mitral position. A flow probe was affixed between the atrial and ventricular chamber and pressure transducers were inserted in the atrial, ventricular, and aortic locations (AMpack, Vivitro Labs). Tests utilized a stroke volume of 71.8 mL, heart rate of 70 BPM, and input flow waveform comprising of a 35% systolic-65% diastolic configuration (S35 Waveform, Vivitest software, Vivitro Laboratories). Results: Tests revealed a root mean square volumetric flow rate (QRMS) of 139 mL/s, an effective orifice area (EOA) of 1.18 cm2, transvalvular pressure of 6.88 mmHg and a regurgitation factor (RF) of 16%. While the RF was higher than bioprosthetic valves (RF ~ 6.5%; unpublished observation performed under similar conditions in our laboratory), it was nonetheless considerably less compared to clinically categorized mild mitral valve RF of < 30%.1Zoghbi WA Enriquez-Sarano M Foster E et al.Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and doppler echocardiography.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003; 16 (doi:10.1016/S0894-7317(03)00335-3.): 777-802Google Scholar Conclusions: The tubular PSIS mitral valve appears to facilitate robust hydrodynamic valve function and may concomitantly serve as a scaffold for de novo valvular tissue growth by the host after implantation. KEYWORD: ICTEHV-O-14 The authors do not declare any conflict of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructural HeartSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207