Risk stratification biomarkers for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: bacteraemia patients who develop deep-seated tissue infections with high morbidity and mortality to guide clinical trial enrolment and clinical management. METHODS: bacteraemia enrolled consecutively over 3 years. RESULTS: High levels of IL-17A, IL-10 or soluble E-selectin at bacteraemia diagnosis correlated with the duration of positive blood cultures. When thresholds defined in an independent cohort were applied, these biomarkers were robust predictors of persistent bacteraemia or endovascular infection. High serum levels of IL-17A and IL-10 often preceded the radiographic diagnosis of infective endocarditis, suggesting potential utility for prioritising diagnostic radiographic imaging. High IL-8 was prognostic for all-cause mortality, while IL-17A and IL-10 were superior to clinical metrics in discriminating between attributable mortality and non-attributable mortality. High IL-17A and IL-10 identified more patients who developed microbiological failure or mortality than were identified by infective endocarditis diagnosis. CONCLUSION: These biomarkers offer potential utility to identify patients at risk of persistent bacteraemia to guide diagnostic imaging and clinical management. Low biomarker levels could be used to rule out the need for more invasive TEE imaging in patients at lower risk of infective endocarditis. These biomarkers could enable clinical trials by enriching for patients with the greatest need for novel therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".