MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005840664 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23727

An investigation of the droplet size distributions in a cyclone reactor for liquid‐liquid heterogeneous reactions using FBRM and PVM

2020· article· en· W3005840664 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCoalescence (physics)MechanicsMaterials scienceCyclone (programming language)Liquid phasePhysicsThermodynamicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A multi‐element process coupled cyclone reactor for the liquid‐liquid heterogeneous reaction was proposed. This paper presents the investigation of dispersed phase droplet size distributions near the wall surface using FBRM and PVM. To translate a chord length distribution (CLD) measured by the FBRM instrument into its droplet size distribution (DSD), a CLD‐DSD transformation model was proposed. Moreover, the effects of operational parameters on the droplet size distributions were studied. The results show that the total inlet flow plays a decisive role on the dispersed phase droplet size distributions, while the influence of feed ratio is mainly reflected in inhibiting the probability of droplet coalescence. In comparison, the influence of overflow ratio on the droplet size distributions can be neglected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it