MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005846473 · doi:10.4018/ijsst.2019070101

Constraint-Based Privacy Preserving-Path Computation Element

2019· article· en· W3005846473 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Hajaje, Mouhcine Guennoun, Zine El Abidine Guennoun

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Smart Security Technologies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsCisco Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomomorphic encryptionComputer scienceEncryptionPath (computing)Shortest path problemTheoretical computer scienceComputationComputer networkHomomorphic secret sharingSecure multi-party computationTopology (electrical circuits)Distributed computingMathematicsAlgorithmGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information privacy and protection is fundamental in the context of path computation. When a path computation client (PCC) requests the shortest path between two nodes from a path computation element (PCE), it desires to do so while protecting the sensitive information carried by the query as well as the overall topology of the network. The authors provide a novel framework to compute the shortest path, between a source and a destination, subject to a constraint, represented in the case by a required minimum bandwidth, while preserving the privacy of both client and server. By employing a secure homomorphic encryption scheme, the PCE can blindly compute the path while being oblivious to the content of the encrypted queries. The output of the PCE computation is an encrypted path that is only decipherable by its original secret key. The implementation using the homomorphic scheme over the integers from Van Dijk, Gentry, Halevi, and Vaikuntanathan (DGHV) shows promising results that the authors analyze in detail throughout this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.517
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Smart Security TechnologiesSame topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207