MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005852701 · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ab6ee7

Modeling of Fuel Cell Cold Start and Dimension Reduction Simplification Method

2020· article· en· W3005852701 on OpenAlexaff
Hongliang Jiang, Liangfei Xu, Henning Struchtrup, Jianqiu Li, Quanquan Gan, Xin Xu, Zunyan Hu, Minggao Ouyang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaBeijing Municipal Science and Technology CommissionChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsStack (abstract data type)Proton exchange membrane fuel cellCold start (automotive)Fuel cellsDimension (graph theory)Mass transferReduction (mathematics)Key (lock)Computer scienceDurabilityAutomotive industryMaterials scienceNuclear engineeringMechanical engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringMechanicsChemical engineeringPhysicsMathematicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sub-zero startup ability remains a key barrier for commercial application of polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEMFC), especially for automotive applications. In order to improve the startup ability and durability of fuel cells, understanding of the characteristics and mechanisms of cold start is essential, and here modeling of fuel cell cold start plays an important role. In this study, a one-dimensional model is developed to simulate the fuel cell cold start. The model includes mass transport and phase change, heat transfer and electrochemical reaction. Key features such as membrane water and local current distributions are analyzed. Based on the one-dimensional model and simulation results, a spatial reduced simplified model is developed that distinguished only n states across the cell. The simplified model inherits the key features of the one-dimensional model, while the computational cost is significantly reduced to 10% (from 216 s to 20.88 s). The one-dimensional model and simplified model are both validated by the cold start experiment and the voltage error and temperature error are within 15% and 1.2 K respectively. Thus, the proposed simplified model could be used in dynamic simulation and in further multi-scale modeling study to build a stack model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207