De l’invisibilité du capital : La Junte des Philippines de Goya (1815)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite its landmark status in Goya’s oeuvre, the painting The Assembly of the Royal Company of the Philippines (1815), more commonly known as The Junta of the Philippines, has attracted little scholarly attention. An austere and imposing painting, it is the depiction of a meeting of stockholders presided by a diminutive King Ferdinand VII in an interior setting that will be identified as a “finance room.” The canvas evinces a particular point of view on the relationships between the metropole and its faraway territorial possessions based on the absence of the colonies in the canvas. It will be argued that the pictorial setting of the finance room reasserts the virtual nature of the relationships between Madrid and its colonies. By comparing the Junta to contemporaneous British representations of spaces of finance, this study seeks to remove Goya’s work from the isolation in which previous accounts have largely kept it confined. This paper reveals the ways in which the mechanisms of late eighteenth and early nineteenth century finance capitalism were disclosed pictorially by one of the era’s most eminent artists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".