MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P4-09-09: Characteristics of stage 1 to 3 breast cancer patients with amplification of centromere of chromosome 17

2020· article· en· W3005908275 on OpenAlexaff
Ioannis A. Voutsadakis, Vanessa Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsSault Area Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerBiologyInternal medicineChromosomeMedicineCancerGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Amplification of the centromeric region of chromosome 17 (CEP17) as measured by In Situ Hybridization (ISH) of the CEP17 probe is used clinically as part of the ISH assay for HER2 status determination in breast cancer. The value of amplification of CEP17 beyond its use in the HER2 ISH test and characteristics of cases bearing CEP17 amplification, have not been fully explored. Methods: A retrospective review of charts of patients with stage 1 to 3 breast cancer that had a dual probe HER2/ CEP17 FISH test in our cancer center during an eight-year period was performed. Data on demographic, and cancer-specific characteristics of the included patients were extracted. The group of patients with an amplified CEP17 defined as mean copy number ≥3 per nucleus was compared with the group without amplification. Results: Two hundred and two patients were included in the analysis. Amplification of CEP17 was observed in 36 patients (17.8%). All patients in the amplified group had a concomitant amplification of HER2 (mean copy number ≥3 per nucleus). In the CEP17 non-amplified group 78 of 166 patients (47%) had an amplified HER2 status. More patients in the amplified group had a clinical HER2+ status according to the 3-protein classifier (33.3% versus 11.5% in the non-amplified group) and less patients in the amplified group had a clinical ER+/ HER2- status (63.9% versus 81.8% in the non-amplified group, x2 p=0.0003). Other significant differences between the amplified and CEP17 non-amplified groups were observed in their lymph node (LN) status (55.6% of patients in the amplified group versus 36.8% in the non-amplified group were lymph node positive, p= 0.04) and in the nuclear heterogeneity component of grade (90.9% of patients in the amplified group were nuclear grade 3 versus 66.9% in the non-amplified group, p= 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in overall stage, grade, menopause status or histology. Conclusion: Patients with amplification of CEP17 had a co-amplified HER2 and were more commonly HER2+, LN positive and grade 3 in the nuclear component of grade. Citation Format: Ioannis Voutsadakis, Vanessa Davies. Characteristics of stage 1 to 3 breast cancer patients with amplification of centromere of chromosome 17 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-09-09.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207