A flavor uniformity evaluation and improvement of Chinese spirit by electronic nose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fenjiu spirits are famous for their multifarious flavors in China. Nevertheless, the uniformity and homogeneity of the products are always challenges for the producers. Three flavor measurement methods, that is, zNose™, GC-MS, and spirit tasters, were employed and correlated for evaluation of Fenjiu flavors' difference. An automatic blending system was designed to improve the uniformity, where base liquors of Dazongjiu, Dajiu, and Daijiu, as well as pure water, were used for blending, and BPNN was employed for regression and error minimization. Results showed that zNose™ results could be correlated with GC-MS in 95%; hence, zNose™ can replace GC-MS in Fenjiu flavor measurement. With the zNose™ assistance, an experimental scale, fully automatic blending system could be optimized with different modern mathematical algorithms to improve the Fenjiu products uniformity. We believe that this detailed work will advance the scientific knowledge in the field and help to facilitate the uniformity and homogeneity of Fenjiu products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".