MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005946196 · doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103177

Cannabis use in pregnancy: a harm reduction approach is needed with a focus on prevention and positive intervention

2020· letter· en· W3005946196 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Nursing · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forces CollegeWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCannabisPregnancyMedicineConfoundingIntervention (counseling)Harm reductionHarmPsychiatryObstetricsPsychologyFamily medicineInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commentary on: Corsi DJ, Walsh L, Weiss D, et al . Association between self-reported prenatal cannabis use and maternal, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes. JAMA 2019;322:145–52. Cannabis use is increasing in North America among young people aged 15 to 24 years including women who are pregnant. With recent legalisation in multiple jurisdictions, and discussion about its medical benefits for a variety of conditions, it is anticipated that cannabis use may further increase during pregnancy. Cannabinoids can readily cross the placenta and may disrupt the complex fetal endogenous cannabinoid signalling system. This may lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Previous studies have varied in methodology and treatment of confounding …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it