REGINAL BUDGETS IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2019: IS THERE GROWTH POTENTIAL?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been an increase of the RF subjects consolidated budgets revenues in the first quarter of 2019. It takes place together with the slowdown in economic growth. The basis of this budget revenue growth was formed by corporate income tax receipts (results of final calculations of previous year), personal income tax and excise. In contrast to the Federal budget, the subjects of the Russian Federation used most of the revenue growth to increase funding at the beginning of the year. Тhus, in the first quarter of the year, the priorities for the consolidated budgets of the subjects of the Russian Federation were education, social policy and housing and communal services. At the same time, the volume of investments in fixed capital at the expense of regional budgets has significantly decreased, largely determining the overall dynamics of this indicator. The problem of budget deficits remains for several Russian regions despite the positive dynamics of revenues. It requires restraining the growth of key budget expenditures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it