Évolution des politiques relatives à l’inclusion scolaire au Brésil et au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d’une perspective sociohistorique de la comparaison, cette contribution propose une analyse comparative de politiques éducatives entre le Québec et le Brésil contribuant aux finalités de transformation sociale et d’équité de l’éducation inclusive. Une description des principales politiques éducatives associées aux différentes vagues du paradigme inclusif dans les deux contextes à l’étude est présentée. Conçues comme des interprétations locales de ces injonctions internationales, ces politiques témoignent de diverses tensions en matière de prise en compte de la diversité au sein de la formation du personnel scolaire. Ces tensions transversales sont révélatrices d’attentes et de contraintes communes et permettent de contribuer à une meilleure compréhension de l’incidence des politiques inclusives sur la transformation du rôle de l’enseignant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".