Local Estimation of Critical and Off-Peak Periods for Grid-Friendly Flexible Load Management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the demand-side management (DSM) context, some appliances are remotely controlled by the utility or by end-users based on the expected aggregated consumption profile or day-ahead electricity rates. The main objective of these actions is to shift the load from critical to off-peak periods. This article proposes a novel approach to estimate in real time the load as seen by the distribution power network. The only requirement to perform this online estimation is the voltage measurement at the electrical board panel of the end-user building. The proposed method combines digital filtering, statistical process, and transient analysis to make possible the accurate identification of the corrective actions introduced by the voltage regulation system of the distribution network. Hence, this identification permits the estimation of the aggregated load profile. The method provides real-time information that can be used by the end-user or an automated energy management system to initiate demand response actions depending on the state of the grid, e.g., shaving, shifting, or modulation of the local load. Experimental data of three different locations permitted the validation of this novel approach, which enables the implementation of grid-friendly home energy managements systems with DSM functions at a very low cost for the utilities and end-users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it