MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sarcopenia in Elderly Surgery

2019· article· en· W3006008514 on OpenAlexaff
Emile CH Woo, Belinda Rodis

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsFraser HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaProvidence Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcopeniaMedicinePrehabilitationMuscle massPerioperativeIntensive care medicineMEDLINEPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationGerontologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sarcopenia is a condition in which patients have an abnormally low muscle mass with poor muscle function. It is prevalent in older patients and is often associated with frailty. It has gained increasing recognition as a significant indicator of poor surgical outcomes. In this review, we examine the concept of sarcopenia and its impact on surgical outcomes and current research on its management. We also discuss the diagnosis of sarcopenia in terms of muscle mass and muscle function and common definitions of both terms. An overview of the impact of sarcopenia on different surgical specialties is reviewed. Lastly, a survey of current treatments available for sarcopenia and their limited impact are discussed with a view to encouraging possible future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Academy of Medicine SingaporeSame topicNutrition and Health in AgingFrench-language works237,207