MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Proof of Concept of a Cloud-Based Smart Dual-Fuel Switching System to Control the Operation of a Hybrid Residential HVAC System

2019· article· en· W3006093126 on OpenAlexaff
Danilo Yu, King Yeung Tung, Navid Ekrami, Gulsun Demirezen, Alan S. Fung, Farah Mohammadi, Kaamran Raahemifar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHVACThermostatAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceCloud computingSmart gridDual (grammatical number)Demand responseControl systemEmbedded systemAir conditioningReal-time computingEngineeringElectrical engineeringOperating systemElectricity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A net-zero energy house was outfitted with IoT technology and devices to monitor its energy generation and consumption. The house has a rooftop PV array, an efficient hybrid (or dual-fuel) HVAC system, and efficient appliances to achieve net-zero status. Signals between the thermostat and the HVAC system were intercepted by a custom-built wifi-enabled circuit board to transmit the operating status of the HVAC unit and receive control signals from a remote server for optimal supervisory control. The project was developed as a proof of concept to show that a cloud-based intelligent control system that automatically chooses the best fuel source to use can benefit the homeowner (19% energy cost savings is possible) and contribute to decarbonization (29% reduction). If employed on a wide scale with a smart grid that sends pricing and demand response signals, huge potentials in reducing carbon emissions can be achieved without sacrificing homeowner costs and comfort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207