<i>Ascodichaena rugosa</i> . [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A description is provided for Ascodichaena rugosa . Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. DISEASE: Although generally not regarded as pathogenic, there are some indications that Ascodichaena rugosa can act as a parasite. An ultrastructural study (using German material on beech) showed that hyphae of the fungus were distributed solely in phellem cells; cell-to-cell invasion was effected by penetration hyphae, causing no extensive dissolution of the cork wall; finger-like hyphae in the most recently formed layer of cork cells were interpreted as haustoria, suggesting a parasitic relationship; areas of bark infected by the fungus showed increased production of cork cells (BUTIN & PARAMESWARAN, 1980). On oak, the fungus colonizes cork cells and parasitizes the last separated phellem cells by forming finger-like haustoria. A full description of this disease and symptoms was provided by BUTIN (1981 a ). HOSTS: Acer pseudoplatanus (bark), Carpinus betulus (bark), Castanea sativa (twig), Fagus grandifolia (bark), F. crenata (branch), F. orientalis, F. sylvatica (bark, branch, dead attached twig, dead fallen twig, living bark, living twig, root, trunk, wood), F . sp. (bark), Nothofagus pumilio (twig), Quercus ilex (bark), Q. petraea (bark, dead attached twig, dead fallen bark, dead fallen twig, dead twig, living twig), Q. pubescens (twig), Q. robur (bark, dead attached twig, dead fallen twig, living twig), Q. sessilis (dead attached twig), Q. suber (twig), Quercus sp. (attached wood, bark, branch, dead attached twig, dead fallen twig, living twig, trunk, twig). GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: ASIA: Pakistan, Japan. NORTH AMERICA: Canada (Ontario, Québec), USA (Kansas, Maine, New Hampshire, New York). SOUTH AMERICA: Chile. EUROPE: Austria, Finland, France, Republic of Georgia, Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Slovak Republic, Sweden, Ukraine. TRANSMISSION: By snails, which graze the stromata, and excrete viable spores (BUTIN, 198l a ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".