MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006186183

Development of an external beam PIXE microprobe at the University of Guelph

2010· article· en· W3006186183 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maren C. Gamble

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroprobeBeam (structure)Materials scienceOpticsPhysicsNuclear physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work describes the new in-air proton microprobe at the University of Guelph. External microprobes have been successfully implemented by several groups worldwide (for example, [1-3]), but the Guelph external beamline is the only one currently operational in Canada. The in-air proton microprobe, typically operating at 2.5 MeV uses a Dyer Systems QL-100 quadrupole doublet focussing system. The beam optics parameters have been assessed using ion optics simulations as well as grid shadow patterns. Design elements and characteristics of the probe-forming system will be discussed and preliminary results obtained in vacuum and within a small air-filled chamber will be presented. The air-filled chamber allows necessary detectors to be calibrated and tested in both air and helium environments. The designs for the exit nozzle, the chamber, and the safety system, will also be discussed. Initial PIXE spectra obtained using the OM-DAQ software package are presented here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207