L’amitié comme refuge émotionnel au collège classique ; le cas de deux dirigés spirituels de Lionel Groulx
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article étudie les différentes relations d’amitié qu’entretiennent deux jeunes hommes, dirigés spirituels de Lionel Groulx, dans le cadre du collège classique québécois au début du XXe siècle par le biais d’une analyse de journaux intimes et de correspondances. En empruntant des concepts de l’histoire des émotions, les relations amicales entretenues par Erle G. Bartlett (1886–1945) et Émile Léger (1883–1908), dirigés spirituels de Lionel Groulx (1878–1967), sont considérées comme refuges émotionnels au sein de la communauté émotionnelle stricte du Collège de Valleyfield. Ces amitiés, définies comme catholiques, servent à faire adopter aux collégiens les normes comportementales et émotionnelles prônées par l’établissement scolaire. Les jeunes hommes semblent entretenir des relations qui se différencient de celles de leurs pairs, notamment de par la place prédominante qu’y occupent le catholicisme et l’échange émotionnel. Lionel Groulx et son entourage, par la pratique de ces amitiés, expriment une masculinité alternative à celle de plus en plus virile qui se popularise au début du XXe siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".