MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3006232770 · doi:10.7939/r3kd1r22m

Understanding the Neurological and Functional Development of Children with Critical Congenital Heart Disease

2018· article· en· W3006232770 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Florencia Ricci Bartol

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseMedicineHeart diseasePediatricsIntensive care medicineCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Critical congenital heart disease (cCHD) encompasses the most severe forms of congenital heart defects. To survive, infants with cCHD must undergo complex cardiac surgeries (CCS) in early life. Thanks to continuous improvements in the overall care of these children, survival rates have improved significantly, and now most children with cCHD can reach adulthood. By the late twentieth century, as the percentage of children surviving CCS increased, researchers began to wonder about their neurodevelopment. Today, after more than three decades of further studies, it is clear that children with cCHD are at high risk for developmental delays. Developmental challenges commonly include deficits in cognitive, language, motor, behavior and social interaction abilities. These challenges arise from the cumulative effect of multiple recognized pre- and post-natal factors, and contrary to what was previously thought, these do not strictly relate to the presence of hypoxemia or the cardiac surgery itself. By examining three issues not previously described in the literature, this thesis aims to improve the understanding of the neurological and functional developmental impact of CCS in children with cCHD. All three projects in this thesis include children with cCHD registered in the Western Canadian Complex Pediatric Therapies Follow-up Program (WCCPTFP). This inception cohort project identifies all infants born with cCHD who undergo early-life CCS at the Stollery Children’s Hospital (Edmonton, Alberta), and follows them prospectively across western Canada. As part of this program, developmental outcomes are determined by multidisciplinary assessment at approximately 8 months, 21 months and 4.5 years of age. The study presented in chapter 2 begins this work by assessing the frequency and presentation of chronic neuromotor disability (CND), including cerebral palsy and acute brain injury in kindergarten-aged children who have survived CCS. Results indicated CND affects 6% of CCS survivors and almost 10% of those who have required more than one CCS. Most children with CND could ambulate without the need of a mobility device, and often had a high frequency of associated developmental impairments. Older age in days at first CCS, highest plasma lactate before first CCS, and undergoing more than one CCS were predictors of CND. The thesis work continues in chapter 3, where a more specific group of kindergarten-aged children is examined: those who survive the Fontan operation. The aim of the study is to better understand the impact of this operation on the functional abilities of children, and its potential relation with stroke (an already recognized peri-operative complication). Overall, more than a quarter of children experienced deterioration of functional abilities following the Fontan operation. Both peri-operative stroke and older age at Fontan were predictors of decline of functional abilities. Finally, in chapter 4, the relationship between the need for gastrostomy tube feeding (GTF) any time before the 21-month multidisciplinary assessment and the presence of developmental delays is assessed. Findings suggested GTF identifies CCS survivors at risk for developmental delay who would benefit from early developmental intervention. Presence of chromosomal anomaly, single ventricle anatomy, number of post-operative days with open sternum and total number of hospital days at CCS were predictors of GTF requirements before the 21-month assessment. Together these three projects address key gaps in knowledge by describing outcomes not previously reported, all of which can have a significant impact on the participation of children in activities of everyday life. Efforts to prevent and to address these developmental difficulties should be undertaken.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta Library→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→