Speaking in Pictures: Reading, Memory and Interpretation in Francesco da Barberino’s Advice to Women in his Reggimento e costumi di donna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article étudie les différentes façons dont la lecture, la visualisation et l’interprétation travaillent de pair dans la tradition manuscrite de Reggimento e costumi di donna, un précis de bonne conduite rédigé par Francesco da Barberino à l’intention des femmes. Le public de la fin du Moyen-Âge était capable de naviguer entre des images verbales et visuelles du bon et du mauvais comportement selon une expérience corporelle de la lecture, alors que les lecteurs éprouvaient leur adhésion aux objectifs moraux prônés par la pensée chrétienne. Ce texte pouvait s’adresser à des hommes, des femmes et des enfants se trouvant dans un contexte familial. Le livre se termine par l’invocation d’un splendide joyau qui fonctionne comme un puissant procédé mnémotechnique destiné à aider le lecteur à se souvenir du texte et à activer le message dans son esprit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".