PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP PRAKTIK BISNIS EMITEN PENERBIT EFEK SYARIAH BERDASARKAN PRINSIP KETERBUKAAN PASAR MODAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efek syariah merupakan surat berharga yang sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip syariah di Pasar Modal. Efek syariah merupakan sarana investasi bagi umat islam yang ingin berinvestasi di Pasar Modal. Efek Syariah diterbitkan oleh emiten yang menjalankan kegiatan usahanya berdasarkan prinsip syariah dan telah mendapat penilaian Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI). Sebagai negara berpenduduk mayoritas muslim, efek syariah berperluang besar untuk berkembang pesat di Indonesia. Dalam rangka mengakomodir hal tersebut, konsumen selaku pemegang efek syariah harus mendapatkan kepastian hukum bahwasanya kegiatan bisnis yang dilakukan emiten penerbit efek syariah sesuai dengan prinsip syariah. Salah satu caranya yaitu melalui prinsip keterbukaan yang memberikan akses informasi kepada konsumen sebagai pemegang efek syariah untuk mengetahui secara berkala bahwasanya emiten penerbit efek syariah selalu menjalankan usahanya berdasarkan prinsip syariah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.059 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".