MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006296127 · doi:10.33476/ajl.v10i2.1225

PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP PRAKTIK BISNIS EMITEN PENERBIT EFEK SYARIAH BERDASARKAN PRINSIP KETERBUKAAN PASAR MODAL

2020· article· id· W3006296127 on OpenAlex
Hari Rizki Satria

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueADIL Jurnal Hukum · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Finance and Communication
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessBusiness administrationHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efek syariah merupakan surat berharga yang sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip syariah di Pasar Modal. Efek syariah merupakan sarana investasi bagi umat islam yang ingin berinvestasi di Pasar Modal. Efek Syariah diterbitkan oleh emiten yang menjalankan kegiatan usahanya berdasarkan prinsip syariah dan telah mendapat penilaian Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI). Sebagai negara berpenduduk mayoritas muslim, efek syariah berperluang besar untuk berkembang pesat di Indonesia. Dalam rangka mengakomodir hal tersebut, konsumen selaku pemegang efek syariah harus mendapatkan kepastian hukum bahwasanya kegiatan bisnis yang dilakukan emiten penerbit efek syariah sesuai dengan prinsip syariah. Salah satu caranya yaitu melalui prinsip keterbukaan yang memberikan akses informasi kepada konsumen sebagai pemegang efek syariah untuk mengetahui secara berkala bahwasanya emiten penerbit efek syariah selalu menjalankan usahanya berdasarkan prinsip syariah.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it