Symptom Distribution Regularity of Insomnia: Network and Spectral Clustering Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent research in machine-learning techniques has led to significant progress in various research fields. In particular, knowledge discovery using this method has become a hot topic in traditional Chinese medicine. As the key clinical manifestations of patients, symptoms play a significant role in clinical diagnosis and treatment, which evidently have their underlying traditional Chinese medicine mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the core symptoms and potential regularity of symptoms for diagnosing insomnia to reveal the key symptoms, hidden relationships underlying the symptoms, and their corresponding syndromes. METHODS: An insomnia dataset with 807 samples was extracted from real-world electronic medical records. After cleaning and selecting the theme data referring to the syndromes and symptoms, the symptom network analysis model was constructed using complex network theory. We used four evaluation metrics of node centrality to discover the core symptom nodes from multiple aspects. To explore the hidden relationships among symptoms, we trained each symptom node in the network to obtain the symptom embedding representation using the Skip-Gram model and node embedding theory. After acquiring the symptom vocabulary in a digital vector format, we calculated the similarities between any two symptom embeddings, and clustered these symptom embeddings into five communities using the spectral clustering algorithm. RESULTS: The top five core symptoms of insomnia diagnosis, including difficulty falling asleep, easy to wake up at night, dysphoria and irascibility, forgetful, and spiritlessness and weakness, were identified using evaluation metrics of node centrality. The symptom embeddings with hidden relationships were constructed, which can be considered as the basic dataset for future insomnia research. The symptom network was divided into five communities, and these symptoms were accurately categorized into their corresponding syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight that network and clustering analyses can objectively and effectively find the key symptoms and relationships among symptoms. Identification of the symptom distribution and symptom clusters of insomnia further provide valuable guidance for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".